<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Brief History of Obama and the Political Blogosphere</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cscannella.wordpress.com/2008/07/04/a-brief-history-of-obama-and-the-political-blogosphere-draft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cscannella.wordpress.com/2008/07/04/a-brief-history-of-obama-and-the-political-blogosphere-draft/</link>
	<description>a media studies blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:58:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Outline for talk at Professor Kang&#8217;s Media class &#171; extensions</title>
		<link>http://cscannella.wordpress.com/2008/07/04/a-brief-history-of-obama-and-the-political-blogosphere-draft/#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>Outline for talk at Professor Kang&#8217;s Media class &#171; extensions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 18:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cscannella.wordpress.com/?p=143#comment-401</guid>
		<description>[...] post, A Brief History of Obama and the Political Blogosphere, will be used as a way to introduce the topic, and frame out &#8220;the politics of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post, A Brief History of Obama and the Political Blogosphere, will be used as a way to introduce the topic, and frame out &#8220;the politics of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Political Blogger&#8217;s Reading List &#171; extensions</title>
		<link>http://cscannella.wordpress.com/2008/07/04/a-brief-history-of-obama-and-the-political-blogosphere-draft/#comment-327</link>
		<dc:creator>A Political Blogger&#8217;s Reading List &#171; extensions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cscannella.wordpress.com/?p=143#comment-327</guid>
		<description>[...] Scannella, C. A brief history of obama and the political blogosphere. http://cscannella.wordpress.com/2008/07/04/a-brief-history-of-obama-and-the-political-blogosphere-dr... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Scannella, C. A brief history of obama and the political blogosphere. <a href="http://cscannella.wordpress.com/2008/07/04/a-brief-history-of-obama-and-the-political-blogosphere-dr.." rel="nofollow">http://cscannella.wordpress.com/2008/07/04/a-brief-history-of-obama-and-the-political-blogosphere-dr..</a>. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jodi</title>
		<link>http://cscannella.wordpress.com/2008/07/04/a-brief-history-of-obama-and-the-political-blogosphere-draft/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>Jodi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 17:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cscannella.wordpress.com/?p=143#comment-143</guid>
		<description>great, Carlo, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great, Carlo, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlo Scannella</title>
		<link>http://cscannella.wordpress.com/2008/07/04/a-brief-history-of-obama-and-the-political-blogosphere-draft/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlo Scannella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cscannella.wordpress.com/?p=143#comment-142</guid>
		<description>Jodi, 

Re: terminology, that&#039;s always been a problem, and I don&#039;t really have an answer. I&#039;ve generally used &quot;liberal blogosphere&quot; or &quot;liberal political blogosphere,&quot; and more or less tried to acknowledge the fact that it&#039;s an oversimplification of what&#039;s out there. 

To deal with this, I&#039;ve just tried to focus primarily on Daily Kos -- on one hand, it&#039;s short-changing everything else in the liberal blogosphere, but on the other, because it&#039;s the largest and probably most influential (esp. in terms of shaping how the MSM &quot;sees&quot; blogs and bloggers), I think it&#039;s warranted. 

PS, I can email you the papers...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jodi, </p>
<p>Re: terminology, that&#8217;s always been a problem, and I don&#8217;t really have an answer. I&#8217;ve generally used &#8220;liberal blogosphere&#8221; or &#8220;liberal political blogosphere,&#8221; and more or less tried to acknowledge the fact that it&#8217;s an oversimplification of what&#8217;s out there. </p>
<p>To deal with this, I&#8217;ve just tried to focus primarily on Daily Kos &#8212; on one hand, it&#8217;s short-changing everything else in the liberal blogosphere, but on the other, because it&#8217;s the largest and probably most influential (esp. in terms of shaping how the MSM &#8220;sees&#8221; blogs and bloggers), I think it&#8217;s warranted. </p>
<p>PS, I can email you the papers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jodi</title>
		<link>http://cscannella.wordpress.com/2008/07/04/a-brief-history-of-obama-and-the-political-blogosphere-draft/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Jodi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 23:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cscannella.wordpress.com/?p=143#comment-141</guid>
		<description>Carlo, this is excellent. One thought: is there a term you could use that would acknowledge the narrow range of blogs that come under netroots or political blogosphere? Maybe something like &quot;well-known and highly ranked Democratic and progressive political blogs&quot; or &quot;small group of influential Democratic blogs that have crossed into the msm&quot;? 

Also, is there any way I can read the two papers you mention on the sidebar? Full disclosure: Geert and I are working on a book on blogging; of course I&#039;ll be sure to cite you etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carlo, this is excellent. One thought: is there a term you could use that would acknowledge the narrow range of blogs that come under netroots or political blogosphere? Maybe something like &#8220;well-known and highly ranked Democratic and progressive political blogs&#8221; or &#8220;small group of influential Democratic blogs that have crossed into the msm&#8221;? </p>
<p>Also, is there any way I can read the two papers you mention on the sidebar? Full disclosure: Geert and I are working on a book on blogging; of course I&#8217;ll be sure to cite you etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlo Scannella</title>
		<link>http://cscannella.wordpress.com/2008/07/04/a-brief-history-of-obama-and-the-political-blogosphere-draft/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlo Scannella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 02:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cscannella.wordpress.com/?p=143#comment-117</guid>
		<description>Thanks Dave! I appreciate it!

I&#039;ll definitely run down those two events...both worthwhile additions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Dave! I appreciate it!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll definitely run down those two events&#8230;both worthwhile additions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://cscannella.wordpress.com/2008/07/04/a-brief-history-of-obama-and-the-political-blogosphere-draft/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 14:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cscannella.wordpress.com/?p=143#comment-116</guid>
		<description>Well done Carlo. This is well researched and contains a thoughtful narrative, and more nuanced approach than most. Two &quot;events&quot; I would add here. One the TechCrunch interview when Arrington interviewed all the candidates and Obama received the highest rating among Dems. Second would be the strategic choice to rely on &quot;crowd funding&quot; because Hilary had already tapped the large donors, creating a connection between Obama and &quot;net funding&quot; that was just as much out of necessity as of ideology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done Carlo. This is well researched and contains a thoughtful narrative, and more nuanced approach than most. Two &#8220;events&#8221; I would add here. One the TechCrunch interview when Arrington interviewed all the candidates and Obama received the highest rating among Dems. Second would be the strategic choice to rely on &#8220;crowd funding&#8221; because Hilary had already tapped the large donors, creating a connection between Obama and &#8220;net funding&#8221; that was just as much out of necessity as of ideology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
